Next: Text type evaluation
Up: Tagset evaluation
Previous: Relevant tagset modifications
Tests run in this exercise (for details, see appendix A)
Phenomena suggested for further testing (cf. appendix B):
- Functional vs. adverbially used participles (VVPP/ADJD)
Difficulty: copula constructions and stative passive have
identical formation. Stepwise change to definitions in
guidelines, by syntactic constructions.
(Type II)
- Indefinite vs. adjective-like determiners (PD-/PI-/ADJ-)
Merging of demonstrative and indefinite pronouns/determiners?
Membership to demonstr./indef. is lexically determined!
(Type Ic?)
- Indefinite determiners with or without articles (PIDAT/PIAT)
Context dependent or lemma dependent?
(Type Ia, Ic?)
- adverbially used adjectives vs. non-adjectival adverbs ADJD/ADV
Differences in semantics.
(Type II)
- wordforms doch, aber, denn (KON/ADV)
This word forms are ambiguous between coordinating
conjunctions and adverbs, depending on position within
sentence
(Type Ib)
- wordforms wie, als (KOUS/PWAV/KOKOM/KON)
These word forms
have a variety of functions and therefore tags.
Which functions can be merged into one tag easiest?
(Type I, Ic?)
- proper names vs. foreign material (FM/NE)
Very problematic: dependent on semantics.
Interaction with NE/NN test.
(Type I)
- Punctuation $(, $., $,
Is there external impact of behavour of comma on
relative pronouns, articles, subordinating conjunctions?
(Type Ic?)
Next: Text type evaluation
Up: Tagset evaluation
Previous: Relevant tagset modifications