Next:
Contributors
Up:
Morphosyntactic Annotation
Previous:
Morphosyntactic Annotation
Recommendations
Contents
Contributors
Authors
Other contributors
Editors and Assistants
Introduction
Rationale for the present proposal
Harmonisation with proposals of the Lexicon Working Group
Recommendations for morphosyntactic categories
Reasonable goals for standardisation
Common standards for representation and encoding of annotations of texts
Common standards in describing and representing linguistic categories or structures
Common standards for specifying annotation schemes and their application to texts
Conclusion: Manageable levels of achievement in specifying standards
Word categories: Tagset guidelines
Obligatory attributes/values
Recommended attributes/values
Special extensions - Optional generic attributes/values
Special extensions - Optional language-specific attributes/values
Intermediate Tagset
Underspecification and ambiguity in tagging
Dealing with underspecification
Dealing with ambiguity
Grammatical homonymy
Portmanteau tags
Human uncertainty ambiguities
Genuine textual ambiguities
Multiple tagging practices: Form-function and lemmatisation
References
English tagset, with intermediate tags
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Italian DMI codes, with intermediate tags
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7