There follows a list of examples to illustrate how EAGLES proposes to encode well-known restrictions.
Impersonal verbs are usually taken to be defective (pleuvoir `to rain'). Even so, they may be not defective in other constructions.
(100)![]() | Il pleut des cailloux sur la place |
(101)![]() | Des cailloux pleuvent sur la place |
In such cases, it is possible to mark the morphosyntactic restriction of 3rd person singular on the lexical unit only in association with the impersonal construction:
Self=[Pers:3][Numb:sg]
Different auxiliaries can be associated with the main verb for different constructions.
(102)![]() | To be gone down to the cellar | (Self=[Aux:BE]) |
(103)![]() | Être descendu à la cave | (Self=[Aux:ETRE]) |
(104)![]() | To have gone down the steps | (Self=[Aux:HAVE]) |
(105)![]() | Avoir descendu les escaliers | (Self=[Aux:AVOIR]) |
English and German verbs have the particularity to be sometimes expanded with an adverbial particle. This particle is isomorphormic to a preposition, it may adhere to the verb or be separated from it by complements. Though it looks like a preposition, an adverbial particle does not introduce a complement. The particle is definitely not a slot realisation but is a component of the same morphological unit in different uses. The verb set, for example, may occur with or without a particle:
(106)![]() | He set the table |
(107)![]() | You are all set up now | (Self=[Part:up]) |
(108)![]() | They set up an inquiry | (Self=[Part:up]) |
(109)![]() | I have set it all up for you | (Self=[Part:up]) |
If an object is accidently coreferent with the subject, the reflexive or reciprocal pronoun is nothing else but one of the many realisations of an object slot.
(110)![]() | She trusted him |
(111)![]() | He asked me whether it was true |
(112)![]() | He asked himself whether it was true |
(113)![]() | They always fight their superiors |
(114)![]() | They always fight each other |
If a pronoun has no reference at all, the verb is considered to be a pronominal verb. The pronoun is not a slot realisation but it is a component of the lexical unit.
(115)![]() | S' exclama-t-il | (Self=[Pro:SE]) |
(116)![]() | La tasse s'est cassée | (Self=[Pro:SE]) |
Some cases are controversial because the lack of referentiality is not so obvious.
(117)![]() | Il s'{ est lavé |
(118)![]() | Il s' est lavé la figure | (Self=[Pro:SE]) |
(119)![]() | He expected that they would make some profits | (S[Finite:+][Introd:THAT]) |
(120)![]() | He wondered whether he should come | (S[Finite:+][WhType:Inter]) |
(121)![]() | He wondered who should come | (S[Finite:+][WhType:Inter]) |
(122)![]() | He wanted to leave | (VP[Mood:infinitive]) |
(123)![]() | They started screaming all around | (VP[VerbF:ing]) |
(124)![]() | He talked of leaving | (VP[VerbF:ing]) |
(125)![]() | He looked preoccupied by this meeting | (VP[VerbF:pastpart]) |
(126)![]() | He counted on the manager | (PP[Introd:on]) |
(127)![]() | He jumped into/under/... the train | (PP[Introd:into]/PP[Introd:under]/...) |
(128)![]() | It is raining cats and dogs | (PRO[Lex:IT]) |
(129)![]() | There is a lot of rain | (PRO[Lex:THERE]) |
It is allowed to attach a case indication on a NP or a PP, even for languages with no case marking. This facility prevents the systematic recording of pronouns as slot realisations, which is possible if wished however.
(130)![]() | He/John went back home | (NP[Case:nom]) |
(131)![]() | I missed him/John so much | (NP[Case:acc]) |
(132)![]() | Mary expected [a friend/to welcome a friend/that a friend would come] |
(133)![]() | A friend is expected by Mary |