Preliminary Recommendations

References

-

Alsina, A. & Mchombo, S. (1988). Lexical mapping in the Chichewa applicative constructions, Technical report, Stanford University and San Jose State University, Stanford.

-

Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (1993). Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context, Technical report, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

-

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words, Clarendon Press, London.

-

Boguraev, B. & Briscoe, T. (eds) ( 1989). Computational lexicography for natural language processing, Longman, London.

-

Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Bresnan, J. & Kanerva, J. (1988). Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar, Technical report, Stanford University and Xerox PARC, Stanford.

-

Bresnan, J. & Moshi, L. (1989). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax, Linguistic Inquiry 21.

-

Chomsky, N. (1955). The logical structure of linguistic theory, Plenum, New York. Published in 1975.

-

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

-

Chomsky, N. (1986a). Barriers, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Chomsky, N. (1986b). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use, Praeger, New York.

-

Davis, A. (1996). Lexical semantics and linking in the hierarchical lexicon, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

-

Di Sciullo, A. M. & Williams, E. ( 1987). On the definition of word, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

-

Dowty, D. (1982a). Grammatical relations and Montague Grammar, in P. Jacobsen & G. Pullum (eds), The nature of syntactic representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 79-130.

-

Dowty, D. (1982b). More on the categorial analysis of grammatical relations, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 102-133.

-

Dowty, D. (1987). Thematic proto roles and argument selection, Language 67: 547-619.

-

Dowty, D. (1989). On the semantic content of the notion `thematic role', in G. Chierchia, B. Partee & R. Turner (eds), Property theory, type theory and natural language semantics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

-

EAGLES (1996). Synopsis and comparison of morphosyntactic phenomena encoded in lexicons and corpora. A common proposal and applications to european languages, Technical Report EAG-LWG-Morphsyn, ILC-CNR, Pisa. Available at:
http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/morphsyn/morphsyn.html.

-

Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case, in E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), Universals in linguistic theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

-

Foley, W. & van Valin, R. (1984). Functional syntax and Universal Grammar, CUP, Cambridge.

-

Fraser, N. (1994). Dependency parsing, PhD thesis, UCL, London.

-

GENELEX (1993). Projet Eureka GENELEX. Rapport sur la couche syntaxique, Technical Report Version 4.0, ASSTRIL, GSI-ERLI, IBM France and Sema Group, Paris.

-

Gruber, J. (1976). Lexical structure in syntax and semantics, North Holland, New York.

-

Heid, U. & McNaught, J. (eds) (1991). EUROTRA-7 Study: Feasibility and project definition study of the reusability of lexical and terminological resources in computerised applications, IMS, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.

-

Hellwig, P. (1983). Dependency Unification Grammar, in E. Hajicova (ed.), Functional Description of Language, Charles University, Prague, pp. 67-84.

-

Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Jensen, K., Heidorn, G. & Richardson, S. ( 1993). Natural language processing: The PLNLP approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Ma.

-

Kaplan, R. & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Karlsson, F., Voutilainen, A., Heikkilä, J. & Antilla, A. (1995). Constraint Grammar: A language-independent system for parsing unrestricted text, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

-

Levin, L. (1987). Toward a linking theory of relation changing rules in LFG, Research report CSLI-87-115, CSLI, Stanford.

-

Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon, PhD thesis, MIT.

-

Manzini, R. (1983). On control and control theory, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421-446.

-

Marcus, M., Kim, G., Marcinkiewicz, M., MacIntyre, R., Bies, M., Ferguson, M., Katz, K. & Schasberger, B. (1994) . The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure, Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Workshop, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

-

Marcus, M., Marcinkiewicz, M. & Santorini, B. ( 1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank, Computational Linguistics 19(2): 313-330.

-

Montemagni, S. & Pirrelli, V. ( 1995). Do lexical rules apply across the board? A corpus-based investigation in the machinery of the causative-inchoative alternation in Italian, Proceedings of the Acquilex-II Workshop on Lexical Rules, Cambridge.

-

Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V. & Ruimy, N. ( 1995). Ringing things which nobody can ring: A corpus-based study of the causative-inchoative alternation in Italian, Acquilex-ii working paper, ILC-CNR, Pisa. Also to appear in Textus.

-

Procter, P. (1987). Longman dictionary of contemporary English, Longman, London.

-

Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon, Computational Linguistics 17(4).

-

Pustejovsky, J. (in press). Linguistic constraints on type coercion, in P. St. Dizier & E. Viegas (eds), Computational lexical semantics, CUP, Cambridge.

-

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. ( 1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language, Longman, London.

-

Rappaport, M. (1983). On the nature of derived nominals, in L. Levin, M. Rappaport & A. Zaenen (eds), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

-

Rohen Wolff, S., Macleod, C. & Meyers, A. ( 1994). COMLEX word classes, Manual, Linguistic Data Consortium, UPenn.

-

Sampson, G. (1995). English for the computer: The SUSANNE corpus and analytic scheme, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

-

Sanfilippo, A. (1993a). Grammatical relations in Unification Categorial Grammar, Lingua e Stile XXVII(2).

-

Sanfilippo, A. (1993b). LKB encoding of lexical knowledge, in T. Briscoe, A. Copestake & V. de Paiva (eds), Default inheritance in unification-based approaches to the lexicon, CUP, Cambridge.

-

Sanfilippo, A. (1995a). Lexical polymorphism and word disambiguation, Working notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on The Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge, Stanford University.

-

Sanfilippo, A. (1995b). Thematic roles: Diathesis/sense alternations and argument selection, Paper presented at the 1995 HPSG Workshop, Tubingen.

-

Sanfilippo, A. & Poznański, V. ( 1992). The acquisition of lexical knowledge from combined machine readable dictionary sources, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Trento.

-

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

-

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form, in T. Shopen (ed.), Grammatical categories and the lexicon, Vol. 3 of Language typology and syntactic description, CUP, Cambridge.

-

ten Hacken, P., Maas, H. & Maegaard, B. ( 1991). Dictionaries in Eurotra, in C. Copeland, J. Durand, S. Krauwer & B. Maegaard (eds), The Eurotra linguistic specifications, The Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

-

Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale, C. Klinksieck, Paris.

-

Vanocchi, M., Rosini, R., Carenini, M., Prodanof, I. & Calzolari, N. (1994). Italian verbs: Developing a neutral formalism for verbal representation, Technical Report ILC-NLP-1994-1, ILC-CNR, Pisa.

-

Williams, E. (1980). Predication, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 81-114.

-

Williams, E. (1981a). Argument structure and morphology, Linguistic Review 1: 81-114.

-

Williams, E. (1981b). On the notions `Lexically Related' and `Head of a Word', Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245-274.