This is a language-specific feature, which should be included at Level 2a of the EAGLES proposal. It has been introduced in order to generalise over certain characteristics that Greek adverbs present, thus allowing them to be grouped together and, in this way, avoiding increase of ambiguity during corpus tagging and preparing the ground for syntactic analysis.
More specifically, we distinguish among five types of adverbs:
``Kathws anaferei o sughghrafeas, o sevasmos einai aghrafos nomos.''
``Ghiati efughes?'' -- main int.
``Ti wraia pou ta perasame!'' -- main excl.
``Dhen xerw ghiati efughe.'' -- sec.int.
``Etrwghe san vasilias.'' -- noun in nominative
``Etrwghe san to vasilia.'' -- noun in accusative
``Etrwghe sa na ytan vasilias.'' -- secondary clause
``Estripse aristera.'' -- nothing
``Aristera sou vrisketai ena kouti.'' -- clitic
``Dhiavazei to ``Anatolika tys Edhem''.'' -- noun phrase in genitive
Attribute | Value | Gr. example | Gr. tag |
Function | pure | akriva | AvNsBaPu |
conjunctive | opws | AvNsBaCj | |
interrogative | ghiati | AvNsBaIr | |
comparative | opws | AvNsBaCo | |
prepositional | aristera | AvNsBaPp | |
Note that, as shown in the above table, certain adverbs may belong to more than one class. For instance, `opws' is coded as both a conjunctive and a comparative adverb. Disambiguation can only be performed on the basis of the semantic function of this word in the specific linguistic context in which it occurs:
``Opws sas einai ghnwsto, efughe.'' -- conj.
``Auto ishuei ghia periptwseis opws y aupnia.'' - comp.