Next: Frames
Up: Standardising Subcategorisation
Previous: Standardising Subcategorisation
Preliminary Recommendations
In this chapter, we present our results regarding the syntactic
description of the subcategorisation of verbs. We note, however, that our
results
could easily be
extended to the syntactic description of other parts of speech. It has
to be emphasised that the purpose of our work in dealing with
standardisation is the following:
- Identify a core of linguistic substance;
- Propose a (very small) set of primitives;
- Propose a neutral descriptive formalism based on this small set;
- Make it easy in this formalism to encode the basic notions (mandatory);
- Give the possibility in this formalism to coherently encode more refined information.
The different approaches to subcategorisation that have been examined
exhibit many common notions, linked together in different combinations
but reflecting a common core. The main points where divergences occur
concern:
- The definition of the boundary between what has to be described in
the syntactic part of the lexicon and what in the semantic part;
- Whether some
semantic information has to be part of the description of the syntactic
properties of the lexical entries; and, as a consequence,
- Whether the interface between syntax and semantics is partly
included in the syntactic description of the lexicon.
In order to avoid committing ourselves to a
specific approach, we opted for a representation model where no
particular criteria are adopted to fix the boundaries and the
interface between syntax and semantics. The main descriptive core is
purely syntactic, but the possibility of encoding semantic
information which has a direct bearing on syntactic behaviour is also
given. Coherence with existing standardisation work for other aspects
of lexical description has been insured by taking into account the
results of the EAGLES morphosyntactic group.